Join HBR Talk as we discuss the consistent rejection by the UK’s legislators in the face of public agitation for gender-neutral laws against sexual violence. What is their objection to equal accountability, and what does this indicate about feminists’ use of crime statistics to make statements about gender-inequality in perpetration?…
Join HBR Talk as we lay down another very important boundary: No, feminists, we do not consent to being your boogeyman, and we do not consent to being the catch-all label for men you hate and fear. Once again, who we are is not your call! Tune in at 7:30PM EST, 12:30AM GMT Opening monologue transcripthttps://www.patreon.com/posts/35290441 Want morehttps://www.patreon.com/posts/35290452...
Join HBR Talk as reject yet another fabulous error in feminist logic: No, feminists, labeling compassion for men “misogyny” doesn’t justify associating everything else you label “misogyny” with the men’s rights movement. Who we are is not your call!…
Join HBR Talk as we address yet another of feminism’s false allegations against our movement: “You just want to send women ‘back to the kitchen!” We stand accused of promoting the wage gap and holding up half the glass ceiling.…
Currently, under the British sexual offenses act, there are 4 basic types of sexual assault that can be committed by one adult against another. These are Rape, Assault by Penetration, Sexual Assault, and Causing sexual activity without consent. The first two types can carry life sentences.…
Join HBR Talk as we hand the “bully” label back to the cry-bully feminists who use it as a tool of political censorship. Tune in at 7:30 PM EST, 12:30 AM GMT.
Opening monologue transcript:
Want more?
Support the badgers:
Patreon us on patreon: to us on minds us on twitter!…
HBR talk examines feminist media’s use of derogatory labels like “rape apologist” as a tool for gatekeeping the gender issues dialogue. Tune in at 7:30PM EST, 12:30AM GMT.
Opening monologue transcript:
Want more?…
Written by Peachy_by_night18 December 2019
Editor’s note: This article is the writer’s research, done for a class. Though it contains some assertions and accepts some concepts that many in the movement will not agree with, it is of interest to the men’s issues discussion for a couple of reasons.…
I recently found an email from medium.com regarding my response to this post
which essentially argued that it’s acceptable for companies like Gillette to target men with bigoted stereotyping, and it’s totally different from negative stereotyping of other groups, because political correctness.…
Join HBR Talk as we discuss feminist writers’ attempts to impose pedophilia acceptance on the men’s rights movment against our will… because that’s not predatory of them at all, is it? Tune in at 7:30PM EST, 12:30AM GMT
Opening monologue transcript:
Want more?…
