So today, we are going after the UK rag The Independent, primarily because they just can’t help but be so blatantly ironic in the writing of this article. From my comprehension their position is like most contemporary ‘news’ media of being extreme to the left. I will also warn that due to the nature of The Independent much like parts of what VICE is now doing the archiving is not going to be the same. I’m going to screenshot the actual site for the sake of ease though I’m going to recommend you check via the archive because of obvious reasons. So what is this all about? Well the title says it all, they want ‘misogyny’ to be considered a form of extremism.
Now anyone with a lick of reason will tell you that legitimate misogyny, much like legitimate misandry can, and should already be considered extreme mindsets. Game developer and another critic of Anita Sarkeesian, Troy Leavitt caught a glimmer of this using what could be a criticism of our end as well. Honestly I don’t think any of us here deny the existence of the “damsel in distress” trope when we make reference to what he decided to coin the “dude is disposable” trope. What we put forward in this dynamic is often a reflection of reality in various ways. Still, like most of the rest The Independent has lost the plot, so Lets Hammer This In!!!
Wow, jumping right on in I can’t help but be like ‘Are you seriously asking this?’ Is hating another human being based on the circumstances of their birth ‘extremism’? Of course it fucking is you daft one named git! Yes, the author of this article only uses a single name of ‘Glosswitch‘. As you can see, all of her articles come off as expectant third wave TERF ideological trash meant specifically to insult any and all men because “muh uterus.” Supposedly she is on her third kid, to boot. It pisses me off that she decides a term from my religion should make up half of her name as well.
As can be seen she is attaching the unfortunate murder of a young girl at a park to the concept of hating all women, that it should be absolutely considered part of the motive that “MEN HATE WIMMIN!” I hope for the sake of the populace that the Greater Manchester Police Department isn’t that ideologically insane.
Now, reading these next paragraphs I’ve got to say, this woman must have some really odd and perverse fetishes to even consider this a possibility. I’m talking ‘guro’ type shit here (very NSFW concept – look up at the risk of your own sanity), also very assuming of the reasoning there, and we all know what happens when you assume. You make an ass of yourself and me too. Couldn’t it perhaps be that it was a crime of passion, or while unlikely it possibly be self defense? Also, last I checked police are supposed to get the facts of the case before determining anything. Motive always comes after physical evidence. Even the highly inaccurate forensic drama shows get this aspect right!
Perhaps the reason that no politician is politicizing the death of this particular victim is they DON’T know if they have a murderer or not. All the article about the case cites is “neck injuries” This tells me (barring any updates released) that the police might have actually found an accident. Even if this was an attack, considering that this incident isn’t being attached to a series of murders. its likely our victim in this case knew their assailant. What? I enjoy detective stories, I know this shit.
Alright now, presuming that the standard of society is “GENDER WAR NAO!” is a sign of absolutist bigoted insanity. If this were the case there would be no human race in the first place. To think irrational hatred of other people is the norm rather than the exception makes for a very bleak view of the world. I actually pity this person for being stuck in such a paranoid view of life as to say that it’s mainstream, and use a citation from the “He for She” feminist think tank home base that is UN Women. That is delusional, especially when PEW research proves otherwise. In short, this person has gone to the Brianna Wu school of victimhood.
With this paragraph we see the source of their insanity. She is admittedly of the school of Dworkin, de Beauvoir and Firestone, to my understanding, the biggest misandrists the feminist movement has ever known! At least she admits that it is a narrow world-view. Then she whines and cries crocodile tears when reasonable human beings start calling people like her cultists. Even some feminists Honey Badger Brigade has had less than favorable run-ins with such as Liana Kerzner admit that these writers are from the darkest end of their ideology. Also a “Right” to pay to penetrate them’? This may be the married man in me talking but that sounds ridiculous as fuck of a thought process.
Yes, the reason is obvious – you are a delusional basketcase who has been indoctrinated into one of the world’s most toxic ideologies outside of pure Islam. The only current differences I’ve seen are the body counts. I’ll let you have the fun of figuring that one out.
After cutting out a completely unnecessary ad photo for an unrelated article, we are stuck with assumptions about the headlines from an article linked in from The New Statesman (Whose site looks like a big print kid’s book,) along with more showing of a lack of comprehension of what a tabloid looks like (Can’t look in the mirror). And MORE accusations of liking the hard wood of mahogany, oh wait – talking about ‘misogyny’….right. But there is more of feminism’s blatant dehumanization of men by depicting them as dens of hatred, and its dehumanization of women by denying agency, responsibility, along with denying the sexual nature of the entire species through the same puritanical bullshit that the evangelicals preached in the late 80’s and early 90’s. In short, I fear for this woman’s children and her mental state because at this point its all but bye bye.
You don’t believe this? THEN WHY ARE YOU PUSHING THIS? Why in the name of Daghda’s fuzzy beard are you pushing forth this hysteria that women are somehow ‘oppressed’ in contemporary Western society? My wife can easily get about any job she wants where I live without question – yet you and the people who push this grit your damn teeth with spite when she wants to spend every moment she can with our beautiful son, a boy who loves his mother and Nana as much as he loves me and his PopPop. I bet, though, if you were to see him live a happy life and achieve greatness, you’d treat him like absolute garbage wouldn’t you Glosswitch?
This is why you feel you have to gender domestic violence, because otherwise VAWA would return to the more gender neutral standard and you’d be shown as the frauds you are! The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence has the following as their crowning statistics:
- On average, nearly 20 people per minute are physically abused by an intimate partner in the United States. During one year, this equates to more than 10 million women and men.1
- 1 in 3 women and 1 in 4 men have been victims of [some form of] physical violence by an intimate partner within their lifetime.1
Now this could perhaps even be more to parity of 50/50 because its likely some men fell through the cracks due to either unwillingness to admit they are hit by their female partners or have even been killed. That would mean approximately 5 million men are abused in this country alone per year. I’m not denying the 5 million women but this shouldn’t discount the 5 million men. This isn’t even beginning to break down between adult and child even so it might be even more horrifying than that. I am pretty confident to bet that more boys get abused than girls do, especially in single mother households where the father is demonized as a ‘deadbeat’ for whatever reason. In such situations I’ve heard stories that the son is abused for the sins of the father. This might explain the actions of some male feminist ‘allies’ to boot, but that’s merely a hypothesis I have – a speculation.
Not all hope is lost. The comments section for this article was very refreshing. Let me show this example:
This is the whole first comment thread of the piece and many of the remaining 96 total as of this writing is more of the same. I went through and read them all. Society is starting to wake up. This is why we have to keep strong – to keep going not just online but in the real world too. Sanity is starting to reclaim prominence and its a beautiful thing to see. I’m glad to be able to show these things off and Break the Narratives left and right.
As such next week I’m going to be putting together something inactivist-related because that’s not only a fight I’ve won for my own son but its being pulled to the forefront by an apparent drop in circumcision rates in the States, and the American medical establishment is in damage control over it. So until then Please Remember to Game Freely!
Latest posts by Alex Tinsley (see all)
- Breaking the Narrative Episode 122: You’re Reviewing What Now? The Dissenter Web Browser! - June 10, 2019
- Breaking in a Concept Episode 2: Giving a Space for Mentoring, Built to Scale! - June 3, 2019
- Breaking the Narrative Episode 121: When false allegations fail in politics: If you can’t win, move the goalposts! - May 13, 2019